Search
Human Rights Liability Rules | The Law of Workplace Sexual Harassment in Canada
602
archive,category,category-human-rights-liability-rules,category-602,eltd-core-1.0,ehf-template-creator,ehf-stylesheet-creator-child,creator child-child-ver-1.0.0,creator-ver-1.3,eltd-smooth-scroll,eltd-smooth-page-transitions,eltd-mimic-ajax,eltd-grid-1300,eltd-blog-installed,eltd-default-style,eltd-fade-push-text-top,eltd-header-centered,eltd-fixed-on-scroll,eltd-default-mobile-header,eltd-sticky-up-mobile-header,eltd-menu-item-first-level-bg-color,eltd-dropdown-slide-from-top,eltd-dark-header,eltd-fullscreen-search eltd-search-fade,elementor-default,elementor-kit-12994

Human Rights Liability Rules

Liability Factum

Liability A Liberal Interpretation Given the broad policy considerations behind the human rights legislation, the statute should be interpreted in a manner “befitting the special nature of the legislation, which as described in, is “not quite constitutional”. The human rights legislation hence must be given “such fair, large and liberal interpretation as will best ensure the attainment of their objects”. O’Malley v Simpson Sears [1985] 2 SCR 536 B. Burden of Proof 2.  The burden of proof rests on the complainant to establish a prima facie case of adverse discrimination. 3. A...

You cannot copy content of this page.