Search
Welcome To Creator Theme
I Employer Liability – Admin - The Law of Workplace Sexual Harassment in Canada
12263
post-template-default,single,single-post,postid-12263,single-format-standard,eltd-core-1.0,ehf-template-creator,ehf-stylesheet-creator-child,creator child-child-ver-1.0.0,creator-ver-1.3,eltd-smooth-scroll,eltd-smooth-page-transitions,eltd-mimic-ajax,eltd-grid-1300,eltd-blog-installed,eltd-default-style,eltd-fade-push-text-top,eltd-header-centered,eltd-fixed-on-scroll,eltd-default-mobile-header,eltd-sticky-up-mobile-header,eltd-menu-item-first-level-bg-color,eltd-dropdown-slide-from-top,eltd-dark-header,eltd-fullscreen-search eltd-search-fade,elementor-default,elementor-kit-12994,elementor-page elementor-page-12263

I Employer Liability – Admin

March 23, 2021
Premium

I Employer Liability – Admin

CaseTribunal
Year 		 Decision
O.P.T. and M.P.T v Presteve Foods Ltd. and PratasHRTO 2015Joint and several liability due to poisoned work environment by deeming statutory provision and also “directing mind”.
 A.B. v Singer Shoes & Paul Singer HRTO   2018 Joint and several liability based on “directing mind”.
Farris – Divisional Court set asideDiv Ct 2011Div Ct set aside Tribunal decision which had erred in not applying the “directing mind” principle to find personal respondents liable.
Desousa v Gauthier2002 Personal respondents were directing minds.
G.M. v X Tattoo ParlourHRTO   2018Joint and several liability based on “directing mind”.
H Vicarious Liability
Previous post
H Vicarious Liability – Civil
Next post

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

You cannot copy content of this page.