Search
H Vicarious Liability – Civil - The Law of Workplace Sexual Harassment in Canada
12258
post-template-default,single,single-post,postid-12258,single-format-standard,eltd-core-1.0,ehf-template-creator,ehf-stylesheet-creator-child,creator child-child-ver-1.0.0,creator-ver-1.3,eltd-smooth-scroll,eltd-smooth-page-transitions,eltd-mimic-ajax,eltd-grid-1300,eltd-blog-installed,eltd-default-style,eltd-fade-push-text-top,eltd-header-centered,eltd-fixed-on-scroll,eltd-default-mobile-header,eltd-sticky-up-mobile-header,eltd-menu-item-first-level-bg-color,eltd-dropdown-slide-from-top,eltd-dark-header,eltd-fullscreen-search eltd-search-fade,elementor-default,elementor-kit-12994

H Vicarious Liability – Civil

H Vicarious Liability – Civil

CaseYear Summary Decision 
K.T. v Denis Vranich, Elixir and Paradise Lane Developments Hamilton Inc.OSC 2011Case by waitress sexually assaulted against employee of bar and finding of vicarious liability. The employee was also seen as “operating mind” which is usually seen as a ground of liability independently of the VL test.Judgment jointly and severally. The case was undefended.
Hudson v Youth Continuum, Phillip Brindle and The Brindle Agency IncOSC 2012 The judgment was against the personal and corporate defendants jointly and severally. There is no analysis of vicarious liability, however. The case was undefended.
Pawlett v Dominion Protection Service Court of AppealAlb CA 2008Finding on vicarious liability where the plaintiff was supervised by person she believed was in charge of the company, often left alone together. No sexual harassment manual found as a factor in the finding. 
Ivic v Lokavic Leave to Appeal deniedOCA 2017 SCC Feb 2018OCA denies plea of VL in case of sexual assault by cab driver against intoxicated woman traveling alone 

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

You cannot copy content of this page.